quote
I see the perpetuation of ancient tribalism and ignorance (read “religion”) to be a grave problem, and the source of much unnecessary suffering in the world; you claim that the problem is either not very serious or that it is unavoidable—in either case there is not much to be done. You do not seem to see what an astonishing number of the world’s conflicts and missed opportunities arise from people’s false knowledge about God, and when specific instances are pointed out to you, you deem them to be inevitable (if it’s not religion it would be something else), or you defensively say, well of course I object to that instance of religious stupidity: parents shouldn’t withhold blood transfusions from their children!… But the truth is, a comprehensive response to the problem of religious ignorance is possible, and a piecemeal response is totally unprincipled and bound to seem so. Our world has be shattered, and is reliably shattered anew with each subsequent generation, by irreconcilable claims about God and his magic books. Until we stop enabling these competing delusions—by our silence and by our silly attempts to change the subject—we will have no one to blame but ourselves when medieval ideas come crashing into public life—as they do, and will, to our great detriment.
—
What should science do? Sam Harris v. Philip Ball | The Reason Project
I feel the same way as Sam Harris - I know lots of otherwise rational people who “believe” (or hope) that religion is true and really don’t think about it much beyond that. They are happy with the community it fosters and, I suppose, the warm fuzzy feeling it gives them to “believe”. I really feel that, if forced to completely describe and / or rationalize their thinking, it would become, as Sam says, like professing a belief in Santa Claus.
Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Content powered by Tumblr.